Full Opinion

Case: 26-2117 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2026 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DANNY M. WELLS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, Judicial Officer of the US Court of Appeals for The Federal Circuit, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, UNITED STATES TAX COURT, U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS, 1-10,000 DOES OF THE JUDICIAL OFFICER PROFESSION, Defendants ______________________ 2026-2117 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota in No. 3:26-cv-00079-ARS, Magis- trate Judge Alice Senechal. ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER Following this court’s August 27, 2026 show-cause or- der, Danny M. Wells files what the court construes as his response. We dismiss. Case: 26-2117 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 10/23/2026 2 WELLS v. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS The United States District Court for the District of North Dakota dismissed Mr. Wells’s case for failure to raise any comprehensible claim, which the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit summarily af- firmed. Mr. Wells now appears to seek our review of both decisions, but we lack jurisdiction. The district court case does not appear to fall within our limited subject matter jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295, and we do not have juris- diction to review decisions of other circuit courts of appeals, see 28 U.S.C. § 1254. To whatever extent Mr. Wells seeks any other relief, he has not identified any basis for our ju- risdiction. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT October 23, 2026 Date