Lloyd W. Johns v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJanuary 19, 2022
Docket1D21-1064
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D21-1064
_____________________________
LLOYD W. JOHNS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
Kevin Blazs, Judge.
January 19, 2022
PER CURIAM.
Lloyd W. Johns appeals an order summarily denying his
petition for writ of habeas corpus, which the trial court construed
as a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.850. Johns asserted that he was convicted of a crime
that was not charged in the information and that the information
did not allege the essential elements of the crime. The trial court
found that his postconviction challenge was untimely, procedurally
barred, and meritless. Finding no error by the trial court, we
affirm.
We also conclude that this appeal is frivolous. See Johnson v.
State, 44 So. 3d 198, 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“Untimely post-
conviction challenges, which do not establish an exception to the
two-year time limit, are abusive and sanctionable, and an appeal
from the denial of an untimely claim is frivolous when no arguable
basis for an exception to the time limitation exists.”). We note that
this appeal marks Johns’ ninth postconviction case in this Court
regarding his judgment and sentence in Duval County Circuit
Court Case Number 04-CF-2806. He received no relief in his eight
prior postconviction cases: 1D06-5128, 1D08-0684, 1D08-3820,
1D13-4487, 1D13-5181, 1D15-1042, 1D15-4313, and 1D20-0118.
The Court warns Johns that any future filings that this Court
determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of
sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings
in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution or facility
of the Florida Department of Corrections for disciplinary
procedures. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2021) (providing that “[a]
prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or
malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal . . . or to have
brought a frivolous or malicious collateral criminal proceeding . . .
is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the
Department of Corrections”).
ROBERTS, RAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Lloyd W. Johns, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2