Shane Granville v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledDecember 29, 2021
Docket1D20-3333
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D20-3333
_____________________________
SHANE GRANVILLE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County.
David W. Fina, Judge.
December 29, 2021
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges a final order revoking community
control and sentencing him to twenty years of imprisonment.
Appointed counsel is unable to argue reversible error occurred
below. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The
arguments raised by Appellant in his pro se brief are without
merit. We affirm the revocation and sentence, but upon suggestion
of appointed counsel and confirmed by our independent review of
the record, remand is required for entry of a corrected revocation
order. The order entered states that Appellant violated three
conditions of his community control. However, in its oral findings,
the trial court found only one violation: failure to complete sex
offender treatment (condition 18). Accordingly, we remand for the
trial court to correct the scrivener's error.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected order.
ROBERTS, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Shane Granville, pro
se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
2