In the Matter of the Marriage of Julie McClaire and Brandit Franco v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Date FiledSeptember 30, 2026
Docket10-26-00209-CV
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-26-00209-CV
In the Matter of the Marriage of
Julie McClaire and Brandit Franco
On appeal from the
County Court at Law of Bosque County, Texas
Judge Luke Giesecke, presiding
Trial Court Cause No. CV25-223
JUSTICE SMITH delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Julie McClaire, appealed a final decree of divorce. In the
docketing statement filed with this Court, Appellant stated that she had not
requested or paid for the Clerk’s Record in this appeal but had done so for the
Reporter’s Record. Appellant also stated that she is not indigent in the
docketing statement.
On September 4, 2026, this Court was informed by the trial court clerk
that Appellant had not requested the Clerk’s Record nor had she paid or made
arrangements to pay for the Clerk’s Record.1 That same day, the Clerk of this
Court issued a letter to Appellant to advise her that the Clerk’s Record had not
been filed due to her failure to pay for or to make arrangements to pay for the
Clerk’s Record. In that same letter, Appellant was also instructed to pay for
or make arrangements to pay for the Clerk’s Record and was directed to inform
this Court that she had done so on or before Monday, September 14, 2026.
Additionally, Appellant was further advised that the failure to comply with the
Clerk’s letter would result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution
without further notice.
The trial court clerk filed a notice with this Court on September 15, 2026,
that payment had not been received from Appellant for the Clerk’s Record. 2
Additionally, Appellant has still not provided this Court with written
documentation showing that she has complied with the Clerk’s directive.
As of this date, the Clerk’s Record has not been filed with this Court.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and for failing to
comply with a requirement of the Rules and of “a notice from the clerk
1
Although a designation of matters to be included in the Clerk’s Record is not required, payment or
adequate payment arrangements for the Clerk’s Record are required for a non-indigent appellant
before the trial court clerk is obligated to prepare, certify, and file the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5,
35.3(a)(2).
2 The Court was also informed by the court reporter on September 14, 2026 that Appellant has not
made payment for the Reporter’s Record after several attempts and the Reporter’s Record has not been
filed as of this date, but that is not the basis for this dismissal.
In the Matter of the Marriage of McClaire and Franco Page 2
requiring a response or other action within a specified time.” See TEX. R. APP.
P. 37.3(b); 42.3(c).
STEVE SMITH
Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: September 30, 2026
Before Chief Justice Johnson,
Justice Smith, and
Justice Harris
Appeal dismissed
CV06
In the Matter of the Marriage of McClaire and Franco Page 3