Full Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€” No. 08-26-00019-CV โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€”โ€” Twin Pines Conservation, LLC, Appellant v. Aliceanne Schmidt and Michael Aston Wiles, Appellees On Appeal from the 465th District Court Bastrop County, Texas Trial Court No. 465-1114 M E MO RA N D UM O PI NI O N 1 This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial courtโ€™s order granting a temporary injunction. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code ยง 51.014(a)(4). Appellees Aliceanne Schmidt and Michael Aston Wiles filed an unopposed notice that appeal is moot. They attached a final judgment in the underlying case signed by the trial court on May 15, 2026. We construe their notice as a motion to dismiss. 1 This case was transferred pursuant to the Texas Supreme Courtโ€™s docket equalization efforts. Tex. Govโ€™t Code ยง 73.001. We follow the precedent of the Third Court of Appeals to the extent it might conflict with our own. See Tex. R. App. P. 41.3. It is well established that if the trial court renders final judgment while an appeal from an order granting or denying a temporary injunction is pending, the interlocutory appeal is rendered moot. Isuani v. Manske-Sheffield Radiology Group, P.A., 802 S.W.2d 235, 236 (Tex. 1991) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant Appelleeโ€™s motion and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice June 16, 2026 Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ. 2