Full Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 08-OCT-2026 08:15 AM Dkt. 49 ODMR NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI A.M., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J.M., Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 3DV221000037) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Gluck, JJ.) Upon consideration of self-represented Defendant- Appellant J.M.'s (J.M.) Motion for Reconsideration (Motion) filed on October 5, 2026, and the record, it appears that: (1) J.M. seeks reconsideration of this court's Summary Disposition Order, filed on September 23, 2026; (2) J.M. requests a "limited vacatur and remand of the property-division determination so that the Family Court may make findings adequately explaining and reconciling the Category 1 valuation methodology applied to the parties' respective premarital real-property interests"; (3) Without any evidence in the record of an encumbrance on A.M.'s pre-marital home, the purchase price of the property was the equity value in the home. J.M.'s argument NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER that the Family Court used different methodologies is without merit; and (4) J.M. presents no point of law or fact that this court overlooked or misapprehended. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 8, 2026. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Daniel M. Gluck Associate Judge 2