Full Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT FIDEL ALONSO VALLS, Appellant, v. HSBC BANK USA, N.A., et al., Appellee. No. 4D20-1984 [May 12, 2021] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrea Gundersen, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17014121. W. Trent Steele of Steele Law, Hobe Sound, for appellant. Richard S. McIver of Kass Shuler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. Appellee, HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (the bank), obtained a foreclosure judgment against Appellee, Fidel Alonso Valls (the borrower), based on the borrower’s failure to make all payments due on the promissory note secured by a residential mortgage on the subject real property which was assigned, along with the promissory note, to the bank by the original mortgagee. Following judicial sale of the property to the bank pursuant to the foreclosure judgment, the borrower timely filed an objection to the sale in accordance with section 45.031, Florida Statutes (2017), as well as an accompanying motion seeking to set aside the foreclosure judgment. Without conducting an evidentiary hearing on the borrower’s objection, the trial court granted the bank’s motion seeking issuance of a certificate of title to the property and directed the clerk of the court to issue title to the property to the bank. The borrower appeals from the order directing issuance of the certificate of title to the bank. He argues that the trial court should not have granted the bank’s motion, and directed issuance of the certificate of title, without first conducting an evidentiary hearing on his timely filed objection to the sale. The bank appropriately confesses error. The statute authorizing judicial sale to satisfy a judgment states: “If timely objections to the bid are served, the objections shall be heard by the court.” § 45.031(8), Fla. Stat. (2017). This court has held “it is error to deny the party objecting under section 45.031(8) an evidentiary hearing.” McKnight v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 214 So. 3d 775 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017); see also Regner v. Amtrust Bank, 71 So. 3d 907, 907-08 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (trial court commits reversible error by issuing certificate of title while objections to judicial sale remain pending). We therefore accept the bank’s confession of error and, as this court did in McKnight, reverse and remand with directions that the trial court: (a) vacate the order directing the clerk to issue the certificate of title to the bank; (b) vacate the improperly issued certificate of title; and (c) conduct an evidentiary hearing on the borrower's objection. Nothing in this opinion shall be construed as a comment on the merits of the borrower's objection. Reversed and remanded with directions. KLINGENSMITH, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. 2