DEVON BROWN v. KALI BROWN
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledFebruary 19, 2020
Docket3D19-2036
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed February 19, 2020.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-2036
Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-1130, CSE 2000252741
________________
Devon A. Brown,
Appellant,
vs.
Kali Brown, et al.,
Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gerald D.
Hubbart, Senior Judge.
Devon A. Brown, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein (Tallahassee),
Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Department of Revenue.
Before LINDSEY, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wilcox v. Dep’t of Revenue, 272 So. 3d 479, 480 (Fla. 3d
DCA 2019) (affirming order ratifying child support hearing officer’s
recommendation where appellant failed to provide transcript of proceedings below
and order was not facially deficient); Davis v. Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Bartell, 221
So. 3d 790, 791 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (affirming where appellant did not preserve
issue on appeal by failing to raise argument before trial court and “ignoring the
process offered below”) (quoting Duggan v. Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Huff, 197 So.
3d 631, 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)); see also Holloway v. State, 342 So. 2d 966, 968
(Fla. 1977) (observing that challenge to authority of merely de facto officer must be
timely); Starks v. Starks, 423 So. 2d 452, 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (affirming order
refusing to honor prior, foreign child custody award where statement of facts,
submitted pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(b)(3), was inadequate substitute for
transcript as it recited very little of parties’ argument of facts presented to lower
court and did not include any rulings, determinations, or any explanations for rulings
made by court).
2