Gabriel Swarek v. Crystal Lindsay
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledMay 18, 2021
Docket1D20-3093
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D20-3093
_____________________________
GABRIEL SWAREK,
Appellant,
v.
CRYSTAL LINDSAY,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Ross M. Goodman, Judge.
May 18, 2021
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Gabriel Swarek, appeals from a final judgment of
injunction for protection against domestic violence with minor
child entered in favor of Appellee, Crystal Lindsay, his ex-wife.
Appellant argues that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction
over him. Because Appellant was not personally served, as
required by section 741.30, Florida Statutes, and Florida Family
Law Rule of Procedure 12.610, and there was no evidence or
finding of waiver of the right to personal service, we agree and
reverse. See § 741.30(4), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“The respondent shall
be personally served with a copy of the petition, financial affidavit,
Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act
affidavit, if any, notice of hearing, and temporary injunction, if
any, prior to the hearing.”); Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.610(b)(2)(A)
(“Personal service by a law enforcement agency is required.”); see
also § 741.30(6)(d)3., Fla. Stat. (requiring a temporary or final
judgment on injunction to indicate on its face that “[t]he court had
jurisdiction over the parties . . . and that reasonable notice and
opportunity to be heard was given to the person against whom the
order is sought sufficient to protect that person’s right to due
process”); Thompson v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 867 So. 2d 603, 605
(Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“[W]ithout proper service of process, the court
lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant.”); Sewell v. Colee,
132 So. 3d 1186, 1188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (explaining that a party’s
attorney may be served only if the party has waived his or her right
to personal service by authorizing the attorney to accept service on
his or her behalf). *
REVERSED.
LEWIS, ROWE, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Jason Cromey of Cromey Law, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
* In light of our reversal for lack of personal jurisdiction, we
find the remaining issue on the merits moot.
2