Freddy Saladriga v. the State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledJanuary 15, 2020
Docket3D19-0473
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed January 15, 2020.
________________
No. 3D19-473
Lower Tribunal Nos. 14-998, 15-26155
________________
Freddy Saladriga,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz,
Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant
Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
HENDON, J.
Mr. Freddy Saladriga qualified as a violent felony offender of special concern
(“VFOSC”). § 948.06(8)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (2014). At his sentencing for violation of
probation, the only issue for the trial court to decide was whether Mr. Saladriga, as
a VFOSC, posed a danger to the community. Though the court orally pronounced
Mr. Saladriga to be a danger to the community, the court did not reduce its findings
to writing. In fact, when told by defense counsel that written findings were required,
the court replied, “the statute allows me to just use the transcript.”
Section 948.06(8)(e)1. requires the court to make written findings articulating
whether or not a VFOSC poses a danger to the community. The State commendably
concedes that the trial court failed to make the mandatory written findings as to
whether Mr. Saladriga posed a danger to the community as required by section
948.06(8)(e)1. We therefore remand for entry of a written order conforming to the
trial court’s oral pronouncement that Mr. Saladriga was a VFOSC in willful violation
of his probation and posed a danger to the community. McCray v. State, 283 So. 3d
406 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“The written findings requirement of section 948.06(8)(e)
is mandatory, not discretionary.”); Barber v. State, 207 So. 3d 379, 384 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2016) (holding that section 948.06(8)(e)1. specifically provides that “the court
shall” make written findings if the court determines that a violent felony offender of
special concern has committed a violation of probation).
Remanded with instructions.
2