Full Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 18, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-1206 Lower Tribunal No. 17-7337 ________________ Katherine Brito, Appellant, vs. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, etc., Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Thomas J. Rebull, Judge. Carrera & Amador, P.A., and Juan M. Carrera and Carmen G. Amador- Carrera, for appellant. Akerman LLP and Nancy M. Wallace (Tallahassee), William P. Heller (Fort Lauderdale), and Eric M. Levine (West Palm Beach), for appellee. Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Bank of Am., N.A. v. Delgado, 166 So. 3d 857, 860 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (noting: “Generally, appellate courts review a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence under an abuse of discretion standard.”) See also § 673.3091, Fla. Stat. (2019); Almendral v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 276 So. 3d 1003, 1004 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (quoting Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Kee Wing, 210 So. 3d 216, 219 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), for the proposition that “[a] party seeking to reestablish a lost note may meet [the requirements of section 673.3091(1), Florida Statutes] either through a lost note affidavit or by testimony from a person with knowledge.”) (internal citations omitted). 2