Gregory Bailey v. the State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledOctober 14, 2020
Docket3D20-0083
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed October 14, 2020.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-83
Lower Tribunal No. 17-17890
________________
Gregory Bailey,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lisa Walsh,
Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public
Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kseniya Smychkouskaya, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and HENDON, JJ.
HENDON, J.
Gregory Bailey appeals his conviction and sentence for misdemeanor assault.
We affirm, but remand for correction of scrivener’s errors in the judgment.
The jury found Bailey guilty of assault, a misdemeanor, 1 as a lesser included
offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. In its oral pronouncements, the
trial court withheld adjudication and placed Bailey on reporting probation for six
months. The written judgment, however, incorrectly provides that Bailey pled guilty
to assault, a felony of the third degree, citing to section 784.021(1)(a), and that the
trial court adjudicated him guilty. Accordingly, as the State properly concedes, this
cause must be remanded for the purpose of correcting the scrivener’s errors so that
the judgment correctly reflects the jury’s verdict and the trial court’s oral
pronouncements. See Malone v. State, 235 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017); Ismer
v. State, 253 So. 3d 769 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018). Bailey need not be present for the
correction of the scrivener’s errors. See Ismer.
The remaining arguments raised by Bailey do not merit discussion.
Affirmed, with instructions.
1
See § 784.011, Fla. Stat. (2017).
2