GI Shavings, LLC v. Arlington Ridge Community Association, Inc. and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledAugust 2, 2021
Docket1D19-3711
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-3711
_____________________________
GI SHAVINGS, LLC,
Appellant,
v.
ARLINGTON RIDGE COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION, INC. and FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION,
Appellees.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Department of Environmental Protection.
Noah Valenstein, Secretary.
August 2, 2021
PER CURIAM.
In this environmental permitting case, Appellant challenged
a minor source air construction permit with an identifying number
ending in 009. While this appeal was pending, the Department of
Environmental Protection issued to Appellant a final air operation
permit ending in 011. No interested party filed a petition for
administrative hearing or a notice of appeal as to the 011 permit.
In response to this Court’s order requesting a status update, the
parties agree that the final air operation permit ending in 011
supersedes the 009 permit and that this appeal is now moot. See
Godwin v. State, 593 So. 2d 211, 212 (Fla. 1992) (explaining a case
is moot if “the issues have ceased to exist”); Montgomery v. Dep’t of
Health & Rehab. Servs., 468 So. 2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
(explaining an appeal becomes moot if, “by a change of
circumstances prior to the appellate decision, an intervening event
makes it impossible for the court to grant a party any effectual
relief”; and this Court can raise mootness on its own motion); see
also Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby, 912 So. 2d 595, 600–02
(Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (“During the pendency of an appeal, the duty
of candor imposes an obligation on counsel to notify the court of
any development that may conceivably affect the outcome of the
litigation, including facts that may raise a question of mootness”;
and sanctioning counsel that did not advise the court of a
settlement reached during the pendency of the appeal).
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.
ROBERTS, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Benjamin J. Grossman and Mallory A. Neumann of Foley &
Lardner, LLP, Tallahassee; Dorothy E. Watson of Foley &
Lardner, Orlando, for Appellant.
John L. Di Masi and Toby Snively of the Law Offices of John L. Di
Masi, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee Arlington Ridge Community
Association, Inc.; Jeffrey Brown, Assistant General Counsel,
Stacey D. Cowley, Assistant General Counsel, and Matthew Knoll,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of General Counsel,
Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida Department of Environmental
Protection.
2