American Medical Academy, Inc. v. State of Florida Board of Nursing
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledSeptember 9, 2020
Docket3D19-2101
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed September 9, 2020.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-2101
Lower Tribunal No. 19-1538-FOI-MQA
________________
American Medical Academy, Inc.,
Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Board of Nursing,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the State of Florida, Board of Nursing.
Leon & Saltiel, PLLC, and Matthew Carcano and Moises A. Saltiel, for
appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Marlene K. Stern, Senior Assistant
Attorney General (Tallahassee), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.
HENDON, J.
We affirm. In our review of the administrative decision of the State of
Florida, Board of Nursing (“Board”), we find that there was no violation of
American Medical Academy’s right to procedural due process and that the record
on appeal shows that the Board’s decision was supported by competent and
substantial evidence. See § 464.019(5)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2018) (providing, in part,
that “[i]f an approved program’s graduate passage rates do not equal or exceed the
required passage rates for 2 consecutive calendar years, the board shall place the
program on probationary status pursuant to chapter 120 . . . .”); A & S Entm’t, LLC
v. Fla. Dep’t of Revenue, 282 So. 3d 905, 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“[T]he final
agency decision cannot be reversed unless the action taken is not supported by
competent, substantial evidence in the record. Other grounds for reversing that
agency’s final action include a material error in procedure or failure to follow proper
procedure, an error in interpreting applicable law and an abuse of delegated
discretion or violation of constitutional or statutory provisions. Absent any such
grounds, the administrative action shall be affirmed.”) (internal citations omitted).
Affirmed.
2