Full Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-26-00076-CR ROBBIE MABRA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1633070 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION Robbie Mabra pled guilty to forgery, a state jail-felony offense, and, pursuant to a plea bargain with the State, was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for two years.1 The State subsequently alleged that Mabra violated the terms and conditions of his community supervision by failing to report and failing to provide urine samples on numerous occasions. After an evidentiary hearing at which Mabra pled true to the allegations, the trial court found the allegations true, revoked Mabra’s deferred adjudication community supervision, and sentenced him to twelve months’ imprisonment. Mabra appeals. Mabra’s appellate counsel has filed a brief stating that he reviewed the record and found no genuinely arguable issues that could be raised on appeal. The brief sets out the procedural history of the case and summarizes the evidence elicited during the course of the trial court proceedings. Since appellate counsel has provided a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced, that evaluation meets the requirements of Anders v. California. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 743–44 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509–10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812–13 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Appellate counsel also filed a motion with this Court seeking to withdraw as counsel in this appeal. 1 This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Second Court of Appeals pursuant to a Texas Supreme Court docket equalization order. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Supp.). Accordingly, we apply the precedent of the Second Court of Appeals in deciding this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. 2 On August 17, 2026, appellate counsel mailed to Mabra copies of the brief, the motion to withdraw, and the appellate record. Mabra was informed of his rights to review the record and file a pro se response. By letter dated October 1, this Court informed Mabra that the case would be set for submission on October 22. We received neither a pro se response from Mabra nor a motion requesting an extension of time in which to file such a response. We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have independently reviewed the entire appellate record and, like appellate counsel, have determined that no arguable issue supports an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). In the Anders context, once we determine that the appeal is without merit, we must affirm the trial court’s judgment. Id. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.2 Scott E. Stevens Chief Justice Date Submitted: October 22, 2026 Date Decided: November 4, 2026 Do Not Publish 2 Since we agree that this case presents no reversible error, we also, in accordance with Anders, grant appellate counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in this case. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant desire to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the appellant must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review (1) must be filed within thirty days from either the date of this opinion or the date on which the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court, see TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2, (2) must be filed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, see TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3, and (3) should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, see TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4. 3