Full Opinion

Opinion issued September 11, 2026 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00877-CR ——————————— CHARLES LEE POLLARD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court Chambers County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 23CCR0715 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Charles Lee Pollard appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated, arguing the stop that led to his arrest was unlawful and thus any evidence collected during the stop should have been suppressed. Because Pollard, who is not indigent, neither filed a complete reporter’s record on appeal nor complied with the partial reporter’s record provisions of rule 34.6, we must presume the omitted parts of the reporter’s record support the judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(c)(1); Fender v. State, No. 09-19-00333-CR, 2021 WL 3518889, at *4 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 11, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.; not designated for publication). To obtain reversal, Pollard must show that the denial of the motion to suppress was harmful, which requires an examination of the entire record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.2; Fender, 2021 WL 3518889, at *5. Absent the entire reporter’s record (all testimony and exhibits offered at trial, including any video and audio recordings), we cannot conduct a harm analysis. Fender, 2021 WL 3518889, at *5; Harmes v. State, No. 14-09-00871-CR, 2011 WL 32206, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 4, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.; not designated for publication). We therefore overrule Pollard’s sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.1 Andrew Johnson Justice Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guiney and Johnson. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 1 In a motion for rehearing, Pollard may explain why he did not file the entire reporter’s record and request leave to file it. 2