Damien Lee Escalera v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Date FiledJuly 29, 2026
Docket06-25-00166-CR
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
In the
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-25-00166-CR
DAMIEN LEE ESCALERA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 297th District Court
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1818597
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A Tarrant County jury found Damien Lee Escalera guilty of aggravated sexual assault of
a child younger than six years old, a first-degree felony, and assessed a sentence of fifty years’
imprisonment. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021 (Supp.). On appeal,1 Escalera argues that
his sentence violates the Eighth Amendment’s2 prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
The State argues that Escalera failed to preserve his sole point of error for appeal. Because we
agree, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, which imposed the jury’s assessed sentence.
As a general rule, a constitutional claim must have been asserted in the trial court to be
raised on appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a). This rule of preservation applies to Eighth
Amendment complaints. Burt v. State, 396 S.W.3d 574, 577 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); Sample v.
State, 405 S.W.3d 295, 304 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2013, pet. ref’d); see Russell v. State, 341
S.W.3d 526, 527–28 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, no pet.). The appellate record shows that
Escalera failed to raise his Eighth Amendment complaint during sentencing or by motion for new
trial. As a result, the trial court was not presented with Escalera’s complaint, and the issue is not
preserved for our review.
1
Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme
Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Supp.). We follow the
precedent of the Second Court of Appeals in deciding the issues presented. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
2
See U.S. CONST. amend. VIII.
2
Having overruled Escalera’s sole point of error on appeal, we affirm the trial court’s
judgment.
Charles van Cleef
Justice
Date Submitted: July 15, 2026
Date Decided: July 29, 2026
Do Not Publish
3