Jose Gonzalez v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Date FiledAugust 28, 2026
Docket07-26-00151-CR
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-26-00151-CR
JOSE GONZALEZ, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 140th District Court
Lubbock County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-2025-CR-0589, Honorable Douglas H. Freitag, Presiding
August 28, 2026
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Before DOSS and YARBROUGH and PRATT, JJ.
Appellant, Jose Gonzalez, appeals his conviction for continuous sexual abuse of
a child1 and sentence to life in prison. Appellant’s brief was originally due July 31, 2026,
but was not filed. By letter of August 10, 2026, we admonished Appellant’s appointed
counsel that failure to file a brief by August 20, 2026, would result in the appeal being
abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 21.02(b).
notice. Instead of filing a brief by that date, on August 27, Appellant’s counsel filed a
motion for extension of time to file a brief. Mindful of counsel’s caseload and the attendant
history of delayed briefing, the Court declines this untimely request, observing that further
extension of the briefing deadline at this point would likely cause further unnecessary
delay in the submission of this cause. See Zuniga v. State, No. 07-26-00147-CR, 2026
Tex. App. LEXIS 7475, at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Aug. 6, 2026, order).
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. if Appellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary
arrangements for filing a brief;
4. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
5. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
6. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
7. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
8. if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect
Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by September 28,
2026. If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent,
2
and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new
counsel; the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any
newly appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before the date the trial court acts per
our directive, he shall immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon
the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
3