Bryce Reagan Tolleson v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
Date FiledSeptember 22, 2026
Docket07-26-00366-CR
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-26-00366-CR
BRYCE REAGAN TOLLESON, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 108th District Court
Potter County, Texas
Trial Court No. 078561-E-CR, Honorable Timothy G. Pirtle, Presiding
September 22, 2026
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Bryce Reagan Tolleson, appeals his conviction for indecency with a
child 1 and sentence to twelve years of confinement. We dismiss the untimely appeal for
want of jurisdiction.
The trial court sentenced Appellant on July 16, 2026. A motion for new trial was
due within thirty days of sentencing, by August 17, 2026. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a),
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 21.11(d).
21.4(a). Appellant did not file a motion for new trial until August 18, 2026. Because the
motion for new trial was untimely, it did not extend Appellant’s deadline to file a notice of
appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (requiring a notice of appeal to be filed within thirty
days after sentencing or within ninety days if a timely motion for new trial is filed).
Accordingly, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due by August 17, 2026. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 18, 2026, one day after
the deadline, and did not file a motion for an extension of time. See TEX. R. APP. P.
10.5(b), 26.3 (permitting an appellate court to extend the appellate deadline by fifteen
days if a motion for extension is filed that reasonably explains the need for an extension).
The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to
hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). When
a notice of appeal, but no motion for extension of time, is filed within the fifteen-day period,
the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner
other than by dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523
(Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (en banc).
By letter of August 20, 2026, we notified Appellant of the consequences of his late
notice of appeal and directed him to show how the Court has jurisdiction over the appeal
by August 31, 2026. Appellant has not filed a response nor had any further
communication with this Court to date.
2
Because Appellant’s untimely notice of appeal prevents this Court from acquiring
jurisdiction over the appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 2
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
2 Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to
the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.
11.07.
3