Frankie Avalon Harris, Jr. v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Date FiledAugust 6, 2026
Docket11-26-00201-CR
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Opinion filed August 6, 2026
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
___________
No. 11-26-00201-CR
___________
FRANKIE AVALON HARRIS, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 259th District Court
Jones County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 012588
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 6, 2023, the trial court placed Appellant, Frankie Avalon Harris, Jr.,
on community supervision for five years for the third-degree felony offense of bail
jumping and failure to appear. TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.10(a), (f) (West 2016).
The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Appellant’s community supervision.
On June 4, 2026, the trial court found the allegations in the State’s motion to be
“true,” revoked Appellant’s community supervision, and sentenced him to four years
imprisonment in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice. The trial court certified that this is a plea bargain case, Appellant does
not have a right of appeal, and Appellant waived his right of appeal. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Nevertheless, Appellant’s counsel filed a notice of appeal.
We dismiss the appeal.
When this appeal was docketed, we notified Appellant that the trial court had
certified that (1) this is a plea bargain case in which Appellant has no right of appeal,
and (2) Appellant had waived his right of appeal. See id.; see also TEX. CODE CRIM.
PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2018). In our letter, we requested that Appellant
respond and show grounds to continue the appeal. Appellant’s counsel responded
and stated that “there are not . . . any grounds for appeal in this matter.”
Rule 25.2(a)(2) provides that, in a plea bargain case in which the punishment
imposed does not exceed the punishment agreed to by the parties, “a defendant may
appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on
before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or (C) where the
specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); see
also CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02. Subsections (A), (B), and (C) are not applicable here.
Further, Rule 25.2 does not permit a plea-bargaining defendant to appeal matters
related to the voluntariness of his plea unless the defendant has obtained the trial
court’s permission to appeal. See Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2001); Carender v. State, 155 S.W.3d 929, 931 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no
pet.).
As noted above, the trial court certified that this is a plea bargain case, that
Appellant has no right of appeal, and that Appellant waived his right of appeal. The
trial court’s certification was signed by Appellant, Appellant’s trial counsel, and the
presiding judge. The documents on file in this court support the trial court’s
certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613–14 (Tex. Crim. App.
2005). Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal without further action. TEX. R.
APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
2
This appeal is dismissed.
W. STACY TROTTER
JUSTICE
August 6, 2026
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
3