Full Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00285-CR Christopher Allan WINNINGHAM, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2026-CR-004298 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 27, 2026 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Appellant, Christopher Allan Winningham, filed a pro se “Notice of Appeal from Negotiated Plea” on April 6, 2026. Thereafter, the trial court clerk filed the clerk’s record. The clerk’s record contains no final judgment of conviction. “With certain exceptions . . ., this court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal filed by a criminal defendant only after a final judgment of conviction.” Zamarripa v. State, No. 04-16-00274-CR, 2016 WL 3085932, at *1 (Tex. App.— San Antonio Jun. 1, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing TEX. CODE 04-26-00285-CR CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02); accord McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.) (“Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction.”). We ordered Winningham to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. Winningham, through his court-appointed appellate counsel, conceded that we have no jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss Winningham’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-