Full Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-26-00019-CR SARIAH GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1683099 Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice van Cleef MEMORANDUM OPINION Sariah Garcia appeals1 four judgments adjudicating guilt, but her combined brief asserts error in only two of them.2 We address Garcia’s combined brief in our opinion in her companion appellate cause number 06-26-00018-CR. As stated in that opinion, in two of the trial court’s four judgments appealed, there is a variance between oral pronouncement of sentence and the trial court’s written judgments. The State concedes the variances. We therefore modify and affirm the judgments in which there is a variance and affirm the judgments in which Garcia makes no complaint. This appeal concerns one of the trial court’s judgments in which Garcia makes no complaint, namely a judgment convicting Garcia of an offense of burglary of a habitation. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a), (c)(2) (Supp.). Accordingly, in this case, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. Charles van Cleef Justice Date Submitted: August 11, 2026 Date Decided: August 12, 2026 Do Not Publish 1 This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Second Court of Appeals pursuant to a Texas Supreme Court docket equalization order. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Supp.). Accordingly, we apply the precedent of the Second Court of Appeals in deciding this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. 2 In this opinion, and in Garcia’s companion appellate cause number 06-26-00020-CR, she does not assert any challenge. However, in her companion appellate cause numbers 06-26-00018-CR (trial court cause number 1655158) and 06-26-00021-CR (trial court cause number 1736179), Garcia challenges the trial court’s written- imposed sentences. 2