Alan J. Mineros-Perez v. the State of Texas
CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Date FiledAugust 12, 2026
Docket04-25-00350-CR
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
OPINION
No. 04-25-00350-CR
Alan J. MINEROS-PEREZ,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2021CR6862
Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Velia J. Meza, Justice
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 12, 2026
APPEAL PERMANENTLY ABATED
A jury convicted Mineros-Perez of sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child.
Mineros-Perez perfected this appeal and filed a brief. The case was submitted on March 27, 2026.
On August 3, 2026, Mineros-Perez’s spouse filed a copy of his death certificate, which shows that
he suffered a stroke and died on June 4, 2026.
The death of an appellant during the pendency of an appeal from a criminal proceeding
deprives this court of jurisdiction. Garcia v. State, 840 S.W.2d 957, 958 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)
04-25-00350-CR
(per curiam). If the death occurs after the appeal is perfected but before the appellate court issues
its mandate, the appeal must be permanently abated. TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(2); Brown v. State, 439
S.W.3d 929, 930 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Abatement is required because each alternative would
improperly resolve the case without full appellate review. Dismissal of the appeal would make the
judgment of conviction final as though we had affirmed it after full review. Vargas v. State, 659
S.W.2d 422, 423 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (per curiam); see also State v. McCaffrey, 76 S.W.3d
392, 392–93 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002) (citing Vargas and explaining the rationale behind permanent
abatement, but holding that rationale inapplicable when the State is the appellant). Alternatively,
setting aside the judgment of conviction and ordering the trial court to dismiss the indictment “once
again equals the result usually reached only after full appellate review.” Vargas, 659 S.W.2d at
423. The appropriate response, therefore, is to withdraw any issued opinions and permanently
abate the appeal. Brown, 439 S.W.3d at 930 (directing the First Court of Appeals “to withdraw its
opinion and permanently abate the appeal”).
Mineros-Perez died after perfecting his appeal and before this court issued a mandate. This
court has not previously issued an opinion in this appeal. We order this appeal permanently abated.
Velia J. Meza, Justice
PUBLISH
-2-