Full Opinion

458 November 4, 2026 No. 1077 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KIPPER ANDREW WALLS, aka Kipper Walls, aka Kipper A. Walls, aka Kipper Wells, Defendant-Appellant. Deschutes County Circuit Court 23CR40850; A188754 Walter Randolph Miller, Jr., Judge. Submitted September 11, 2026. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Kali Montague, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant. Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, Paul L. Smith, Solicitor General, and Christopher A. Perdue, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.* EGAN, J. Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment omitting “and other assessments” and “and assessments”; otherwise affirmed. ______________ * Determined by a two-judge department as authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b). Nonprecedential Memo Op: 354 Or App 458 (2026) 459 EGAN, J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for a single count of driving under the influence of intoxicants. In his only assignment of error, defendant argues that the trial court erred by including terms in the judgment provid- ing that it could impose “other assessments” without fur- ther notice to defendant and without further court order. The state concedes the error. We agree with and accept the state’s concession. See State v. Martinez, 347 Or App 273, 279, 587 P3d 428 (2026) (holding that trial court lacked statutory authority to impose “other assessments” terms in judgment). That error requires us to remand for entry of an amended judgment. Id. at 280 (concluding that when “the only error was the inclusion of terms in the judgment that the trial court had no authority to impose, the appropriate remedy is to remand with instructions to delete the errone- ous terms from the judgment” (brackets and internal quo- tation marks omitted)). We therefore reverse the portions of the judgment related to adding assessments to the total amount owed by defendant and remand to the trial court for entry of an amended judgment deleting the words “and other assessments” and “and assessments.” Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment omitting “and other assessments” and “and assessments”; otherwise affirmed.