Full Opinion

No. 1070 November 4, 2026 437 This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1). IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JAMES MATHEW THORNTON, Defendant-Appellant. Coos County Circuit Court 24CR65278; A188675 Andrew E. Combs, Judge. Submitted September 11, 2026. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Matthew Blythe, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant. Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, Paul L. Smith, Solicitor General, and Christopher A. Perdue, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.* LAGESEN, C. J. Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment omitting “and other assessments” and “and assessments”; otherwise affirmed. ______________ * Determined by a two-judge department as authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b). 438 State v. Thornton LAGESEN, C. J. Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for attempted second-degree escape, fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer, and recklessly endangering another person. He assigns error to the inclusion in the judgment of a provision stating that the court could impose “other assessments” without further notice to defendant and with- out further court order. The state concedes the error. We agree with and accept the state’s concession. See State v. Martinez, 347 Or App 273, 279, 587 P3d 428 (2026) (holding that trial court lacked statutory authority to impose “other assessments” terms in judgment). That error requires us to remand for entry of an amended judgment. Id. at 280 (concluding that when “the only error was the inclusion of terms in the judgment that the trial court had no authority to impose, the appropriate remedy is to remand with instructions to delete the errone- ous terms from the judgment” (brackets and internal quo- tation marks omitted)). We therefore reverse the portions of the judgment related to adding assessments to the total amount owed by defendant and remand to the trial court for entry of an amended judgment deleting the words “and other assessments” and “and assessments.” Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment omitting “and other assessments” and “and assessments”; otherwise affirmed.