State v. Mills
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
Date FiledJuly 20, 2026
DocketCA2026-02-026
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
[Cite as State v. Mills, 2026-Ohio-2759.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
BUTLER COUNTY
:
STATE OF OHIO,
: CASE NO. CA2026-02-026
Appellee,
: DECISION AND
JUDGMENT ENTRY
- vs - : 7/20/2026
:
ROBERT MILLS,
:
Appellant.
CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM HAMILTON MUNICIPAL COURT
Case No. CRB2600010
Letitia S. Block, City of Hamilton Law Director, and Brian K. Harrison, Assistant Law
Director, for appellee.
Engel & Martin, LLC, and Joshua A. Engel, for appellant.
____________
DECISION
Per Curiam.
{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
appellant, Robert Mills, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of
proceedings and original papers from the Hamilton Municipal Court, and upon the brief
filed by appellant's counsel.
Butler CA2026-02-026
{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record
from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the
rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two
potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," id. at 744; (3) requests that this
court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from
prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests
permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly
frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been
served upon appellant.
{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response
having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error
prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel
for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed
for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
BYRNE, P.J., HENDRICKSON and SIEBERT, JJ., concur.
Butler CA2026-02-026
JUDGMENT ENTRY
The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the
motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this
appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Hamilton Municipal Court for
execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this Decision and Judgment
Entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.
Costs to be taxed to appellant.
/s/ Matthew R. Byrne, Presiding Judge
/s/ Robert A. Hendrickson, Judge
/s/ Melena S. Siebert, Judge