Thurman Carl Coleman v. State
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
Date FiledJuly 17, 2026
DocketA26A2133
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
July 17, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A2133. THURMAN CARL COLEMAN v. THE STATE.
In 2022, after a jury trial, Thurman Carl Coleman was convicted of aggravated
sexual battery, aggravated child molestation, and other crimes, and sentenced to life
imprisonment. In 2025, proceeding pro se, Coleman filed a “Motion . . . for a
Determination of Representation,” requesting that he be appointed an attorney “for
his first stage of his appellate rights” and that the trial court determine why his
previous counsel did not preserve his right to file a motion for new trial. The trial
court denied Coleman’s motion. Coleman then filed this direct appeal.1 This Court,
however, lacks jurisdiction.
Because Coleman was convicted in 2022, he is now well outside the time in
which to seek an appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-38(a) (notice of appeal must be filed within
30 days). By seeking to exercise his appellate rights at this point, Coleman is, in
substance, seeking an out-of-time appeal. See State v. Bell, 274 Ga. 719, 719(1) (559
SE2d 477) (2002) (when a court considers pleadings, substance controls over
nomenclature).
In Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471, 506(5) (870 SE2d 758) (2022), our Supreme Court
determined that a trial court lacks authority to grant an out-of-time appeal and that any
remedy involving an out-of-time appeal must be sought in habeas corpus. In response,
the legislature enacted OCGA § 5-6-39.1, which allows a defendant to seek out-of-time
1
Coleman directed his notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, which
transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S26A1131 (May 5, 2026).
relief if the defendant moves for leave to file an out-of-time motion for new trial or
notice of appeal within 100 days from the expiration of the time period for the filing
of such motion or notice, OCGA § 5-6-39.1(a)(1), or if the defendant had an
out-of-time motion or appeal dismissed under Cook. OCGA § 5-6-39.1(b). Here,
OCGA § 5-6-39.1 has no application as Coleman neither filed his motion for leave to
file an out-of-time appeal within 100 days from the expiration of the time period for
filing an appeal nor had a prior motion or appeal dismissed under Cook. As Coleman
has no right to an out-of-time appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider his
appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
07/17/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
2
If Coleman believes that he was unconstitutionally deprived of his right to file
a motion for new trial or to appeal, he may be able to pursue relief by way of a petition
for writ of habeas corpus. See OCGA § 9-14-41 et seq.