Full Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D20-1227 _____________________________ CHRISTOPHER SHAUN KIRKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County. James M. Colaw, Judge. April 12, 2021 PER CURIAM. Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence entered after he admitted to violating probation. His appellate counsel filed an initial brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Appellant filed a pro se brief arguing he could not have violated probation because he was incarcerated and the probationary period had not begun. We disagree. A defendant’s probation may be revoked prior to the commencement of probation if he commits an act of misconduct that demonstrates his unfitness for probation. Stafford v. State, 455 So. 2d 385, 386 (Fla. 1984). Here, Appellant was convicted of written threats to kill or do bodily injury and aggravated stalking. The trial court sentenced him to twelve years’ incarceration followed by eight years’ probation. Appellant was ordered to have no contact with the victim. The order of probation included a special condition of no contact with the victim and a condition requiring Appellant to live without violating any law. The victim had obtained an injunction for protection against domestic violence and a no contact order against Appellant, and Appellant was notified at sentencing that contact with the victim while serving the prison sentence would violate his probation. Nevertheless, during a fourteen-month period beginning several months after sentencing, Appellant sent the victim approximately seventy-five letters while he was incarcerated. Under these circumstances, the trial court did not err in revoking Appellant’s probation upon finding Appellant willfully and substantially violated conditions of his probation. Id. (“[T]he court can revoke an order of probation, the term of which has not yet commenced, should the court determine that the defendant probationer has been guilty of misconduct occurring subsequent to the entry of the order of probation.”) (quoting Martin v. State, 243 So. 2d 189, 190—91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)). AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Christopher Shaun Kirkland, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 2