Jeffery Hudson McElwain v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledMay 29, 2020
Docket1D19-1593
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-1593
_____________________________
JEFFERY HUDSON MCELWAIN,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Lacey Powell Clark, Judge.
May 29, 2020
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders appeal, Jeffery Hudson McElwain challenges
the trial court’s revocation of his probation because the probation
order refers to an affidavit of violation of probation that is not in
the record. We reverse for the reasons discussed below.
In November 2018, the trial court issued a violation of
probation warrant, which led to a no-contest plea by Appellant.
The trial court proceeded to revoke Appellant’s probation,
adjudicate him guilty, and sentence him to seven concurrent terms
of 10 years in prison with jail and prison credit. The order revoking
probation stated, “The Defendant has not properly conducted
himself and violated the conditions of Probation in a material
respect by I. (5), II. (5), III. (5), IV. (SC 24) as cited in the Affidavit
November 29, 2018.” This timely appeal followed.
Despite the trial court’s reference to an affidavit in the order
revoking probation, the record does not reflect that a violation of
probation affidavit was filed in the circuit court. The record
provided to this court did not include the affidavit. And after
Appellant moved to have the record supplemented with a copy of
the affidavit, the clerk of the circuit court responded by certifying
that an affidavit of violation of probation was not found in the
circuit court’s record. This court issued an order under State v.
Causey, 503 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987), for the parties to address the
issue of the missing affidavit. In response, the State conceded that
this case had to be reversed and remanded for the trial court to
determine if the requisite violation of probation affidavit was filed.
See § 948.06(1)(g), Fla. Stat. (2018). “A trial court fundamentally
errs by revoking probation on grounds not alleged in the violation
of probation affidavit.” McCloud v. State, 249 So. 3d 739, 741 (Fla.
1st DCA 2018) (citing Perkins v. State, 842 So. 2d 275, 277 (Fla.
1st DCA 2003)).
We, therefore, reverse and remand for further proceedings.
On remand, the lower court should determine whether an affidavit
of violation of probation has been filed. See Jean-Gilles v. State,
921 So. 2d 860, 862 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (reversing and remanding
for the trial court to determine whether an affidavit was ever filed,
noting that it was possible that the affidavit was misfiled). If the
affidavit was filed, the trial court may reissue an order revoking
Appellant’s probation if the affidavit supports revocation. If an
affidavit was not filed, reversal is without prejudice to the State’s
ability to file a timely and appropriate affidavit.
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.
ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General; Jennifer J. Moore and Jovona I.
Parker, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
3