Valdase L. Barnhart v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledDecember 21, 2020
Docket1D19-3666
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-3620
_____________________________
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellant,
v.
VALDASE L. BARNHART,
Appellee.
_____________________________
No. 1D19-3666
_____________________________
VALDASE L. BARNHART,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Francis Allman, Judge.
December 21, 2020
PER CURIAM.
Valdase Barnhart was charged with one count of fraudulent
use of personal identification information and one count of grand
theft. She was found guilty on both counts and a jury unanimously
agreed that the State had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that
the amount of the fraud perpetrated was $5,000 or more. A
conviction on the count of fraudulent use of personal information
requires the imposition of a three-year term of incarceration. See
§ 817.568(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2020). At the sentencing hearing, the
trial court adjudicated Barnhart guilty of both counts, but held the
imposition of the three-year minimum mandatory sentence in
abeyance.
Barnhart now appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for
judgment of acquittal; the State appeals the trial court’s
withholding of imposition of sentence on the count of fraudulent
use of personal information. We affirm as to Barnhart’s appeal, but
reverse and remand for resentencing as to the State’s appeal.
By statute, for any person convicted of fraudulent use of
personal identification, “the court shall sentence any person
convicted of committing the offense . . . to a mandatory minimum
sentence of 3 years’ imprisonment.” § 817.568(2)(b), Fla. Stat. As
the Legislature has prescribed a three-year mandatory minimum,
the trial court had no authority to do otherwise. See State v.
Kremer, 114 So. 3d 420, 421 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (“mandatory
minimum sentencing enhancements are nondiscretionary and,
therefore, trial courts lack the authority to refuse to apply them”).
Accordingly, we remand for resentencing to include the
mandatory minimum term.
MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
2
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods and
Robert Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorneys General,
Tallahassee, for the State of Florida.
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and M. J. Lord, Megan Lynne
Long, and John E. Villafrate, Assistant Public Defenders,
Tallahassee, for Valdase L. Barnhart.
3