Full Opinion

Case: 25-50836 Document: 87-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 25-50836 November 10, 2026 Summary Calendar Thomas B. Plunkett, III ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Jorge Ivan Romero Blount, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:25-CR-378-1 ______________________________ Before King, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Jorge Ivan Romero Blount pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States, and the district court sentenced him to 30 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. He argues that the district court erred in its imposition of financial-disclosure and credit- * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-50836 Document: 87-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2026 No. 25-50836 approval conditions of supervised release, which are listed as standard conditions 15 and 16 in the written judgment. The Government has filed a motion in response. The Government agrees that these conditions of supervised release violate 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) and moves to vacate the sentence on that basis. The Government also moves for summary affirmance or, in the alternative, an extension of time to file a brief. The parties are correct that the two conditions of supervised release fail to comply with § 3583(d). See United States v. Mendoza, 170 F.4th 921, 927-28 (5th Cir. 2026). While the parties agree that the district court erred by imposing the supervised release conditions, they disagree about the proper disposition. We conclude that the appropriate remedy in this case is to vacate the sentence in part and to remand the case for entry of an amended written judgment. See id.; United States v. Fuentes-Rodriguez, 22 F.4th 504, 506 (5th Cir. 2022). Thus, we GRANT the Government’s motion in part, as follows. We VACATE the two erroneous conditions of supervised release, otherwise AFFIRM the judgment of the district court, and REMAND the case for entry of an amended written judgment. We DENY the Government’s motion in all other respects. 2