Full Opinion

Case: 26-50205 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 26-50205 October 23, 2026 Summary Calendar Thomas B. Plunkett, III ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Rigoberto Santos-Quintero, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:25-CR-2012-1 ______________________________ Before Smith, Southwick, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Rigoberto Santos-Quintero appeals his sentence for illegal reentry. He maintains that the district court failed to give sufficient reasons for impos- ing a 30-month, above-guidelines sentence; that his sentence is substantively unreasonable; that the court erred by imposing various sex-offender-related special conditions of supervised release; and that the court failed to give an adequate explanation for those conditions. * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 26-50205 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/23/2026 No. 26-50205 Santos-Quintero’s challenge to the adequacy of reasons for his sen- tence, which we review for plain error, fails. See United States v. Mondragon- Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 364–65 (5th Cir. 2009). The court articulated spe- cific, individualized reasons, tied to pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and Santos-Quintero’s history of removals and criminal conduct. Santos- Quintero shows no clear or obvious error, see United States v. Lopez-Velas- quez, 526 F.3d 804, 807 (5th Cir. 2008), nor a reasonable probability that fur- ther explanation would have resulted in a lesser sentence, see Mondragon- Santiago, 564 F.3d at 364–65. Santos-Quintero’s preserved substantive- reasonableness argument is likewise unavailing. See Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d at 807; United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 708–09 (5th Cir. 2006). The presentence report supports a conclusion that the sex-offender- related conditions are reasonably related to, at the least, Santos-Quintero’s history and characteristics. See United States v. Salazar, 743 F.3d 445, 451 (5th Cir. 2014). Finally, although the district court did not provide a lengthy explanation for imposing the conditions of supervised release, the reasoning is clear from the record. See id.; see also United States v. Caravayo, 809 F.3d 269, 275 (5th Cir. 2015). AFFIRMED. 2