Full Opinion

Case: 25-20477 Document: 55-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED November 6, 2026 No. 25-20477 Thomas B. Plunkett, III Summary Calendar Clerk ____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Lenel Hopkins, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:24-CR-184-2 ______________________________ Before King, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Lenel Hopkins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hopkins has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-20477 Document: 55-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/06/2026 No. 25-20477 review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 2