United States v. Jackson
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date FiledOctober 23, 2026
Docket25-50767
StatusUnpublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Case: 25-50767 Document: 45-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
____________ Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 25-50767 October 23, 2026
Summary Calendar
Thomas B. Plunkett, III
____________ Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Mario Antoine Jackson,
Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:24-CR-17-1
______________________________
Before Smith, Southwick, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
The attorney appointed to represent Mario Antoine Jackson has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Jackson has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently
developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Jackson’s claims of
ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-50767 Document: 45-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/23/2026
No. 25-50767
without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d
829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the
record reflected therein, as well as Jackson’s response. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
2