Full Opinion

Case: 25-50923 Document: 55-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/03/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 25-50923 November 3, 2026 Summary Calendar Thomas B. Plunkett, III ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Gregorio Conde-Castillo, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:25-CR-99-1 ______________________________ Before Jones, Ho, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Gregorio Conde-Castillo appeals the sentence imposed following his conviction for illegal reentry into the United States. He argues that the district court failed to give sufficient reasons for imposing a 30-month above- guidelines sentence, that his sentence is substantively unreasonable, and that * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-50923 Document: 55-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/03/2026 No. 25-50923 the court erred by imposing supervised release without addressing U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c). Conde-Castillo’s challenge to the adequacy of reasons for his sentence, which we review for plain error, fails. See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v. Fraga, 704 F.3d 432, 438-39 (5th Cir. 2013). The court articulated specific, individualized reasons tied to pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and Conde-Castillo’s history. See Fraga, 704 F.3d at 438-39. He shows no clear or obvious error. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). Moreover, Conde-Castillo has not shown that the alleged error “affected the outcome in district court” by demonstrating “a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” See Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d at 364 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Conde-Castillo’s preserved substantive reasonableness argument is likewise unavailing. See United States v. Gerezano-Rosales, 692 F.3d 393, 400-01 (5th Cir. 2012); Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Finally, in view of the record, Conde- Castillo fails to show reversible plain error regarding the imposition of supervised release. See Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135; United States v. Dominguez- Alvarado, 695 F.3d 324, 330 (5th Cir. 2012); see Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d at 364. AFFIRMED. 2