United States v. Shelton
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date FiledOctober 23, 2026
Docket25-40456
StatusUnpublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Case: 25-40456 Document: 62-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 25-40456
October 23, 2026
Summary Calendar
____________ Thomas B. Plunkett, III
Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Michael Jason Shelton,
Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:22-CV-299
USDC No. 1:19-CR-67-1
______________________________
Before Smith, Southwick, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
Michael Jason Shelton pleaded guilty to accessory after the fact to
murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3, and was sentenced to 180 months of
imprisonment and three years of supervised release. After his direct appeal
was dismissed, see United States v. Shelton, No. 21-40040, 2021 WL 4597770,
1 (5th Cir. Oct. 6, 2021) (unpublished), Shelton, assisted by counsel, filed a
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-40456 Document: 62-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/23/2026
No. 25-40456
28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion raising claims of ineffective assistance. The district
court denied Section 2255 relief and denied a certificate of appealability
(COA). This court granted a COA on Shelton’s claim that his trial counsel
rendered ineffective assistance by failing to move for dismissal on the
grounds that the statute of limitations had expired before he was indicted on
the charge to which he had pleaded guilty.
When a criminal defendant argues that counsel rendered ineffective
assistance, he must show that his “counsel’s performance was deficient” and
that “the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.” Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). A failure to establish either deficient
performance or prejudice defeats the claim. Id. Shelton does not argue and
has not shown that there is a reasonable probability that, but for any error by
counsel, “he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going
to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985); see Lee v. United States, 582
U.S. 357, 364-65 (2017).
AFFIRMED.
2