Full Opinion

Case: 26-10308 Document: 47-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 26-10308 November 6, 2026 Summary Calendar Thomas B. Plunkett, III ____________ Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Montavion Jones, Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-229-1 ______________________________ Before Davis, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Montavion Jones appeals from the judgment of the district court revoking his term of supervised release, imposing a sentence of 12 months of imprisonment, and imposing a sentence of two years of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, he argues that: (1) 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) is unconstitutional in light of United States v. Haymond, 588 U.S. 634 (2019), and (2) the district court violated his Sixth Amendment right to have a jury * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 26-10308 Document: 47-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/06/2026 No. 26-10308 determine whether he committed a crime in violation of the terms of his supervised release. Jones correctly concedes that both of his arguments are foreclosed by our precedent. See United States v. Garner, 969 F.3d 550, 551-53 (5th Cir. 2020); United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005). Summary affirmance is therefore proper. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 2