Full Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 26-1207 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Darrell C. Roseborough lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph ____________ Submitted: October 16, 2026 Filed: October 21, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Darrell Roseborough appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to fraud and theft offenses pursuant to a plea agreement containing an 1 The Honorable David Gregory Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. appeal waiver. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the sentencing issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889- 92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss the appeal. ______________________________ -2-