Full Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-1786 _____________________________ BRIAN ANTONIO EVERETT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Angela M. Cox, Judge. August 17, 2020 PER CURIAM. In this direct appeal from a judgment and sentence, Brian Antonio Everett raises claims of sentencing error that he did not preserve by either a contemporaneous objection or a rule 3.800(b) motion. See Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 569 (Fla. 2008) (clarifying that an appellate court may not review a “sentencing error,” even if fundamental, for the first time on appeal); see also Daniels v. State, 118 So. 3d 996, 997 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“Claims that the written judgment and sentence do not conform to the oral pronouncement must be preserved either with a contemporaneous objection, if possible, or by filing a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion before filing the initial brief.”). Because Everett failed to preserve his claims in the trial court, his remedy, if any, must be by proper motion for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED. RAY, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Rodney G. Gregory of The Gregory Law Firm, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 2