Full Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before de GROOT, MOSLEY, and HARRIS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Vincent L. PANOZZO II Electronics Technician Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202600042 _________________________ Decided: 21 October 2026 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Brian P. John Sentence adjudged 10 October 2025 by a general court-martial tried at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confine- ment for 60 days, and a bad-conduct discharge. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Alaric A. Piette, JAGC, USN United States v. Panozzo, NMCCA No. 202600042 Opinion of the Court _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a). _________________________ PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred.1 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED. FOR THE COURT: MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court 1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. 2