Daniel Anthony Kellond v. State of Florida
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
Date FiledMarch 26, 2020
Docket1D19-1288
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D19-1288
_____________________________
DANIEL ANTHONY KELLOND,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
James C. Hankinson, Judge.
March 26, 2020
RAY, C.J.
Daniel Kellond appeals his judgment and sentence for battery
by a detainee upon another detainee. Kellond contends that the
trial court committed fundamental error by failing to hold a
competency hearing and render a competency determination after
the court had reasonable grounds to believe he was incompetent to
proceed. Accepting the State’s concession of error, we reverse and
remand for further proceedings.
During pretrial proceedings below, the court directed counsel
to schedule a competency hearing after the court received
conflicting expert reports about Kellond’s competency to stand
trial. Yet nothing in the record shows that a competency hearing
took place or that the court ruled on Kellond’s competency.
“Because an independent competency finding is a due-process
right that cannot be waived once a reason for a competency hearing
has surfaced, the trial court fundamentally err[s] in failing to
make such a finding.” Zern v. State, 191 So. 3d 962, 965 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2016); see also Blaxton v. State, 188 So. 3d 48, 48–49 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2016) (reversing for further proceedings where the record did
not reflect that “the requirements of judicial review and
adjudication of competency were met below”).
We thus reverse and remand for a retroactive determination
of competency, if possible. Zern, 191 So. 3d at 965. If the court finds
that Kellond was competent at the time of trial, it must enter a
nunc pro tunc order memorializing that finding with no change in
the judgment or sentence. Id. If a retroactive determination is not
possible, or if the court finds that Kellond was incompetent,
Kellond will be entitled to a new trial if and when competent to
proceed. Id.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
LEWIS and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Kevin Alvarez, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Charlie Lee,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee
2