Full Opinion

Filed 11/9/26 P. v. Hernandez CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D088698 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. FERI2506662) v. PATRICIA HERNANDEZ, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Jonathan Mendoza, Judge. Affirmed. Siri Shetty, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. Patricia Hernandez was charged with one felony count of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) and one misdemeanor count of vandalism (§ 594, subd. (a)). Following a jury trial Hernandez was convicted of the misdemeanor and found not guilty of the assault. The court placed Hernandez on summary probation for 12 months and she was granted credit for time served. Hernandez filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 indicating counsel has not been able to identify any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to independently review the record for error as mandated by Wende. We offered Hernandez the opportunity to file her own brief on appeal, but she has not filed any briefing. DISCUSSION As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to independently review the record for error. To assist the court in its review and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has identified one possible issue which was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict for the vandalism conviction. We have independently reviewed the record for error as requested by counsel. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Hernandez in this appeal. 2 DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed. HUFFMAN, J. WE CONCUR: DATO, Acting P. J. BERMÚDEZ, J.  Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. 3