People v. Bono CA4/1
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
Date FiledNovember 13, 2026
DocketD087461
StatusUnpublished
๐ฐ News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Filed 11/13/26 P. v. Bono CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D087461
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCE433261
v.
LOUIS BONO,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,
Herbert J. Exarhos, Judge. Affirmed.
Heather E. Shallenberger, under appointment by the Court of Appeal,
for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A jury convicted Louis Bono of felony possession of methamphetamine
for sale (Health & Saf. Code, ยง 11378; count 1) and misdemeanor possession
of a controlled substance (ยง 11364; count 2).
Bono was sentenced to an aggregate term of two years. Bono filed a
timely notice of appeal.
Appellate counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v.
Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 indicating counsel has not been able to identify
any arguable issues for reversal. Counsel asks the court to independently
review the record for error as mandated by Wende. We advised Bono he could
file his own brief on appeal, but he has not responded.
As we have noted appellate counsel has not identified any arguable or
potentially viable issues for reversal on appeal. We prefer appointed counsel
to offer possible appellate issues under the guidance of Anders v. California
(1967) 386 U.S. 738. (People v. Kent (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 293, 296.)
However, this case is straight-forward and we can determine there are no
arguable issues on which appellant can rely.
We are satisfied appellate counsel has adequately represented Bono in
this appeal. Bonoโs rights in this proceeding have been protected.
2
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
HUFFMAN, J.๏ช
WE CONCUR:
DATO, Acting P. J.
CASTILLO, J.
๏ช Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate
District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the
California Constitution.
3