Matter of E.O. v. O.O.
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date FiledMay 12, 2026
DocketDocket No. O-10573/24|Appeal No. 6590|Case No. 2024-07854|
StatusPublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
<div>Matter of E.O. v O.O. - 2026 NY Slip Op 02928
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<header>
<div>
<img src="/reporter/images/nys-logo-white.svg" alt="">
</div>
<div>
<span>Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter</span>
<nav>
Court Decisions
Resources
About
</nav>
</div>
<div>
<img src="/reporter/images/lrb-seal.png" alt="">
</div>
</header>
</div>
<nav>
<ol>
<li>Home</li>
<li>All Court Decisions</li>
<li>Decisions</li>
</ol>
</nav>
<div>
<div>
<h1>Matter of E.O. v O.O.</h1>
<p>2026 NY Slip Op 02928</p>
<p>May 12, 2026</p>
<p>Appellate Division, First Department</p>
<p>This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>In the Matter of E.O., Appellant,</p>
<p>v</p>
<p>O.O., Respondent.</p>
</div>
<p>Decided and Entered: May 12, 2026</p>
<p>Docket No. O-10573/24|Appeal No. 6590|Case No. 2024-07854|</p>
<p>Before: Scarpulla, J.P., Mendez, Shulman, Rodriguez, Hagler, JJ. </p>
<div>
<p>Daniel X. Robinson, New York, for appellant.</p>
</div>
<span>[*1]</span>
<p>Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Teresa J. Grogan, Referee), entered on or about December 13, 2024, which, following a fact-finding hearing, found petitioner failed to establish respondent committed any family offense, dismissed the petition, and vacated the temporary order of protection, unanimously affirmed, without costs.</p>
<p>Family Court properly dismissed the family offense petition, as petitioner failed to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence that respondent had committed any acts warranting an order of protection in petitioner's favor (<i>see Matter of Tawanna R. v Michael E.G.</i>, 226 AD3d 524, 524 [1st Dept 2024]). We find no basis to disturb the</p>
<p>court's findings that respondent was more credible than petitioner (<i>see Matter of Sherida L. v Hoggarth S.</i>, 237 AD3d 541, 542 [1st Dept 2025]).</p>
<p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER</p>
<p>OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.</p>
<p>ENTERED: May 12, 2026</p>
</div>
<div>
<footer>
<div>
<p>Court Decisions</p>
All Court Decisions
Official Reports Service
Bound Volumes
Decision Search
</div>
<div>
<p>Resources</p>
RSS Feeds
Style Manual
Citation Tools
Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines
Opinion Selection Criteria
Legal Research Portal
Site Index
</div>
<div>
<p>About</p>
About our Operations
Contact Us
Twitter
</div>
<div>
<p>Quick Contact Info</p>
<p>17 Lodge Street</p>
<p>Albany, NY 12207</p>
<p>Phone: (518) 453-6900</p>
</div>
</footer>
</div>
<div>
<p>Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.</p>
</div>
</div>