Full Opinion

Case: 26-10336 Document: 41-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 26-10336 October 26, 2026 Summary Calendar Thomas B. Plunkett, III ____________ Clerk Taofik Olatunji, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus AT&T Services, Incorporated, Defendant—Appellee. ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:24-CV-1644 ______________________________ Before Smith, Southwick, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The employer-defendant’s brief summarizes the case like this: “Olatunji abandoned an AT&T customer, admitted it, and was fired. Now he claimed discrimination and retaliation.” Olatunji sued under, inter alia, Title VII. In a thorough and convincing 30-page report and recommendation, the magistrate judge concluded that AT&T’s motion for summary judgment _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 26-10336 Document: 41-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2026 No. 26-10336 should be granted. The district judge agreed and dismissed. We have reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law. The summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons carefully set forth by the magistrate judge. 2