Olatunji v. AT&T Services
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date FiledOctober 26, 2026
Docket26-10336
StatusUnpublished
📰 News Coverage: Read the LAWS.com news report on this case
Full Opinion
Case: 26-10336 Document: 41-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2026
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals
____________ Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 26-10336 October 26, 2026
Summary Calendar
Thomas B. Plunkett, III
____________ Clerk
Taofik Olatunji,
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
AT&T Services, Incorporated,
Defendant—Appellee.
______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:24-CV-1644
______________________________
Before Smith, Southwick, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam: *
The employer-defendant’s brief summarizes the case like this:
“Olatunji abandoned an AT&T customer, admitted it, and was fired. Now
he claimed discrimination and retaliation.” Olatunji sued under, inter alia,
Title VII. In a thorough and convincing 30-page report and recommendation,
the magistrate judge concluded that AT&T’s motion for summary judgment
_____________________
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 26-10336 Document: 41-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2026
No. 26-10336
should be granted. The district judge agreed and dismissed.
We have reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law. The
summary judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons carefully set
forth by the magistrate judge.
2