Full Opinion

FILED OCTOBER 22, 2026 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE MANDY UNDZIAKIEWICZ, ) ) No. 41709-3-III Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) KAMALEAH BROWN, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) Appellant. ) HILL, J. — Kamaleah Brown appeals a no-contact order. However, she fails to adequately argue her claims and cites neither the record nor legal authority. We decline review. FACTS We glean the following from the limited record before us. In November 2025, the Okanogan County Superior Court issued a domestic violence and anti-harassment No. 41709-3-III Undziakiewicz v. Brown no-contact order protecting Brown’s son, T.B., and Mandy Undziakiewicz from Brown. Notice of Appeal, Prot. Ord. at 1-3, 4-6. The court determined Brown was a credible threat to T.B. and granted the Undziakiewiczs temporary custody of T.B. See Notice of Appeal, Prot. Ord. at 2, 5, 8. Brown appeals the no-contact order. ANALYSIS Brown argues the court erred in granting the no-contact order. We review trial court decisions regarding domestic violence and anti-harassment orders for abuse of discretion. See Rodriguez v. Zavala, 188 Wn.2d 586, 590, 398 P.3d 1071 (2017). “A trial court abuses its discretion when it is exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons, or when the discretionary act was manifestly unreasonable.” Pederson’s Fryer Farms, Inc. v. Transamerica Ins. Co., 83 Wn. App. 432, 454, 922 P.2d 126 (1996). Brown primarily refers to facts outside the record. We will not consider such evidence. See State v. Bugai, 30 Wn. App. 156, 158, 632 P.2d 917 (1981). Where Brown references facts which may be in the record, she fails to cite them. We “refuse to address an argument that is based on factual assertions not supported by specific reference to the record.” RAP 10.3(a)(6). Brown also fails to provide legal authority. “We do not consider issues that are unsupported by argument and legal authority.” Riley v. Iron Gate Self Storage, 198 Wn. App. 692, 713, 395 P.3d 1059 (2017). 2 No. 41709-3-III Undziakiewicz v. Brown We, therefore, cannot review Brown’s appeal, either factually or legally, and decline to review it. Dismissed. A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW 2.06.040. Hill, J. WE CONCUR: Staab, C.J. Lawrence-Berrey, J. 3