Full Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 3, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D25-2234 Lower Tribunal No. 18-4413-CA-01 ________________ Southern Aircraft Charters, Ltd., Appellant, vs. Miami Executive Aviation, LLC, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge. Offit Kurman, P.A., and Christopher D. Cathey (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant. GrayRobinson, P.A., and Sydney Feldman D'Angelo, for appellee. Before LINDSEY, BOKOR and GOODEN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So. 2d 443, 445 (Fla. 1990) (“[W]here a court is legally organized and has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the adverse parties are given an opportunity to be heard, then errors, irregularities or wrongdoing in proceedings, short of illegal deprivation of opportunity to be heard, will not render the judgment void.”); Lamoise Grp., LLC v. Edgewater S. Beach Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 278 So. 3d 796, 799 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“Procedural due process requires fair notice and a real opportunity to be heard and defend in a manner appropriate to the nature of the case, before judgment is rendered.” (quotation omitted)); see also Abu- Ghazaleh v. Chaul, 36 So. 3d 691, 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“A ‘party’ is defined under Florida law as any person who participates in litigation regardless of whether or not the party is actually named in the pleadings.” (citation modified)). 2