Full Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 13, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-2070 Lower Tribunal No. 18-7093 ________________ A to Z Gifts & More, LLC, etc., et al., Appellants, vs. Merchant Data Systems, LLC, etc., Appellee. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, John W. Thornton, Jr., Judge. Steinberg & Associates, P.A., and Richard L. Steinberg, for appellants. L.M. Schneider Law, P.A., and Leslie Mark Schneider (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Global Satellite Commc’n Co. v. Sudline, 849 So. 2d 466, 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“[T]he failure to pay money in Florida, standing alone, would not suffice to obtain jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant. But, where a requirement to pay money in Florida has been coupled with a Florida venue selection clause in a contract, courts have held that the nonresident defendant should reasonably expect to be haled into court in Florida.” (citations omitted)); Intel-Pas, Inc. v. Jones, 389 So. 2d 1085, 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that when agreement “is silent as to the place of payment,” “[t]he law then implies that payment is to be made where the payee resides or has an established place of business and where payment under the contract may be made”). 2