Juvenile Officer v. A.M.M. (In re Interest of T.R.A.-M.)
IN the INTEREST OF: T.R.A.-M., A.F.A., & A.J.A. Juvenile Officer, Department of Social Services, Children's Division v. A.M.M.
Attorneys
Filed: December 26, 2017 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied January 30, 2018 Application for Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 3, 2018, Sara H. Harrison, for Respondent, Kimberly A. Carrington, for Respondent, Matt Branson, for Appellant
Full Opinion (html_with_citations)
A.M.M. (Father) appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court terminating his parental rights. He presents two points on appeal. First, he claims the trial court erred in requiring him to request counsel in writing for his termination hearing. Second, he claims the trial court erred in proceeding with termination of Father's parental rights without counsel for Father or a waiver of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 86.16(b).