HARDGE v. State

Raymond E. HARDGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

359 S.W.3d 131, 2011 WL 6755921, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1730 • 2011-12-27

Citation359 S.W.3d 131, 2011 WL 6755921, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1730

Date Filed2011-12-27

DocketWD 72863

JudgeHardwick, Ellis, Howard

Cited1 times

StatusPublished

Attorneys

Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant., Shaun J. Mackelprang and Even J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Full Opinion (html_with_citations)

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Hardge appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Hardge contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that plea counsel was ineffective for failing to conduct DNA and fingerprint testing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).